Getting back to the post-nations, transnational governance, it is clear from their dialogue and statements that they are indeed envisioning a complex global order of power that would unite traditional governments and global market layers, complemented by civilian actors. The existing institutional and functional boundaries would dissolve, a kind of joint control or domination would be formed – naturally, for the sake of “humanist” goals like prosperity, health and world peace. If we dig just a little deeper, I’m immediately struck by the fact that these big shots want to replace democracy with complex governance, prioritize technocracy over elections and MPs, and emphasize “expertise” that the general public doesn’t understand instead of transparency. Thirdly, it’s worth noting that Schwab explains in Project Syndicate (a website incidentally owned by George Soros) that there’s no need for new ideologies to establish the Great Reset, they simply need to take “pragmatic steps towards a more resilient, cohesive and more sustainable world”. To me, it seems that we need none other than neoliberalism, a “new wave” social-socialist version of it (to be precise, neocommunism); in other words, communist liberalism should be established (and to quote the ill-fated Hungarian poet, Attila József from 1936: “Maybe mumble a new story, of fascist communism”). And after the socialist-communist liberalism is accepted by all, there’s nothing left to do but deal with the technical- technological-ecological problems and crises – otherwise known as pragmatism, which may allude to a warm-up to Fukuyama’s thesis on the “end of history”. Or maybe even Marx, who envisioned a communist world where all problems were already solved and everyone lives according to the needs of everyone, hunting, fishing or criticizing critics. Everyone will be