The basic position is, in principle, that we must take in people who are in need. It is human kindness, it is natural to help others. Since it is very easy to misuse this help, it is necessary to set limits as to who is truly in need of compassion and who is just looking for a free place to stay until they can get away and disappear in the hustle and bustle of big European cities. But asylum shelters are bad places. Everyone hates staying there, it's an unending day-camp for grown-ups who have nothing to do, but wait until others decide about their fate, whether or not they will be accepted by a rich and compassionate Europe.
And this is a terrible mistake. Whoever invented this imagines that asylum procedures are unbreachable, that the bureaucracy has created a rock-solid system, and that no one can bypass it. It is either because the philosophical basis is wrong - assuming that a migrant has the autonomy of a potato and, on receipt of a court ruling, does what is written on the paper - or because evil people simply want to mess up Europe because this will bring them political and financial gains. In a European Union without borders, no one can stop someone getting into a car and vanishing into thin air.