She argued that Magyar and his Tisza Party are fulfilling EPP expectations: submitting to Brussels’s political agenda. The EPP's rules not only force them to support Ukraine’s accession but also to continue legal actions against national governments—effectively blocking national interests from being represented in EU institutions.
Magyar tries to spin this as giving up just 'a little bit' of sovereignty. But the reality is simple: they cannot claim to represent national interests while actively working to weaken national sovereignty. They are in lockstep with the Brussels elite and going against Hungary's national interests,
the expert concluded.
Lajko acknowledged that party discipline is normal and expected in a political group but emphasized that dissent cannot be sanctioned in a manner that prevents the representation of member's national interests. If party discipline forces politicians to undermine national sovereignty, it contradicts both democracy and the EU’s founding principles. Peter Magyar and his party don’t seem to mind this at all. After all, Manfred Weber is their biggest campaign manager and supporter," the analyst at the Center for Fundamental Rights pointed out.
Cover Photo: Tisza Party President Peter Magyar and European People's Party (EPP) President Manfred Weber (Photo: AFP)




















Szóljon hozzá!
Jelenleg csak a hozzászólások egy kis részét látja. Hozzászóláshoz és a további kommentek megtekintéséhez lépjen be, vagy regisztráljon!