What does the proposed transparency law mean in practice, and in what way does it tighten the rules — if it does at all?
There's a lot of noise around it, but the matter is simple: from now on, actors won’t be able to commit treason funded by foreign money. The proposal merely states that organizations that influence public life using foreign funding in ways that threaten sovereignty — especially constitutional values like peace, security or the family — will be entered on a list. If a foreign donor — be it an EU "civil" fund or the Open Society Foundations (OSF) — tries to transfer money to them, the bank will suspend it and Hungary's national tax authority will investigate.
If it turns out that the money is intended to fulfill the donor’s instructions or goals, the bank simply returns the funds. I don't see this as a deviation from the rule of law — in fact, the U.S. and France enforce even stricter measures against foreign agent activities.
Honestly, I don't understand the whining of media outlets 444, Telex, or Partizan: according to their own consistent, long-held arguments, they operate primarily from domestic micro-donations. If that's true, there’s no need for panic. If not, and if they've lied about this, then we can rightly assume they’ve lied about other things too — like claiming migration is good, sensitization to gender issues is necessary, war is inevitable, or Ukraine’s EU membership benefits all. They're being exposed — and they fear this, but are falling into a trap of their own making.

How serious is the danger of foreign money influencing elections or public life — whether through civil or political channels? What are some striking recent examples?
Just consider the 'rolling dollars' scandal, the EU 'civil' funds opened to political activism in recent years, or the OSF’s decades of subversion in Hungary. The entire Hungarian leftist-liberal machinery runs on foreign money and represents globalist interests here at home: that's why they can't comprehend that the Hungarian Right prioritizes national interests. This globalist–sovereigntist divide is reflected in current debates, too. Just look at who sides with Ukraine instead of Hungary. They’ve simply replaced the puppet politician — now it happens to be Peter Magyar — but the background forces remain unchanged.
Telex, 444, HVG, and others, along with local outposts of human rights fundamentalist organizations, continue their same mission — whether it's migration, gender propaganda, or other issues. Their sole goal is to remove sovereigntist forces from decision-making roles, because we are the thorn in their side, the pebble in their shoe. That’s what's at stake in the 2026 elections.