Another stand for the rule of law mechanism
In reality, Katalin Cseh’s opinion piece is not about freedom of press, no matter how hard she tried to create this façade. Though she attempts to base her statements on the recent Index situation, you soon find out that this is no more than another stand for the rule of law mechanism; only this time she wraps it under the guise of the contention of freedom of press – determined Krisztián Rezső Erdélyi, a Nézőpont Intézet (Hungarian think tank) analyst. Mr. Erdélyi emphasized that the freedom of press argument – according to which the collapse of Index represented the fall of Hungary’s last bastion of free press – is quickly replaced by the frequently repeated ideas which include the “politically motivated” expulsion of CEU, or the politically based distribution of money in the Norwegian-foundation case. It is similarly cogent that the funds that Ms. Cseh deem necessary to sustain freedom of press in Hungary come from the same source that until recently, provided for anti-LGBTQ Polish media--added Mr. Erdélyi. He believes Ms. Cseh will have to acknowledge that the EU already has funds available that media platforms can apply for – in fact, after the virus, these funds were increased. At the same time, she doesn’t even pose the question: if a newspaper can’t survive on the market, is it worth it to use European taxpayer money to put it on a ventilator? Likewise, is it not backwards, in the effort to preserve freedom of press, to place all funding of a publication – as Ms. Cseh suggested— if the unspecified conditions for rule of law were to be violated, under EU control? – elaborated Mr. Erdélyi.




















Szóljon hozzá!
Jelenleg csak a hozzászólások egy kis részét látja. Hozzászóláshoz és a további kommentek megtekintéséhez lépjen be, vagy regisztráljon!