Brussels Also Funnels Money Into Gender Activist's Foundation

Alongside the Norway NGO Grants Program, Brussels has also supported the activist's organization in recent times. Kriszta Bodis, who has recently emerged among the supporters of Peter Magyar, had already echoed Brussels' stance last year, arguing against utility cost reductions, as did Gabriella Gerzsenyi, an MEP for the Tisza Party.

 "We should pay more for energy!"

The gender activist, who is one of Peter Magyar’s closest confidants, already spoke out against utility cost reductions in an interview last spring, when the leader of the Tisza Party was just about to start his political career. She argued that people should pay more for energy.

"Just think about how utility cost reductions shape people's mindset, making them believe they have the right to pay less for energy. And if you pay less, it's considered a good thing. But sometimes, paying more for something is actually a much better thing," Kriszta Bodis stated, making it clear that she believes Hungarian families should pay more for energy.

The pro-migration activist also revealed why she is convinced of this: she believes it is good for people to pay more because it aligns with reality, as there is no infinite amount of energy. However, due to low prices, people will feel the opposite.

Attacking utility cost reductions from Brusels' playbook

The view Kriszta Bodis assumes on utility cost reductions aligns with the interests of Brussels—where the money comes from. As Tamas Menczer, the communications director of Fidesz, pointed out, the European Commission issued a so-called reasoned opinion stating: "The Commission could not identify the transposition of the right of service providers to freely determine the price at which they offer electricity to consumers within Hungarian legislation."

Just last week, Peter Magyar himself  stated at a street forum that utility cost reductions are a "sham". Meanwhile, Gabriella Gerzsenyi, an MEP for Tisza Party, previously worked at the European Commission, where she wrote official reports declaring that the current form of utility cost reduction is unsustainable.

In a recent statement, she also argued that water prices in Hungary are too low, which discourages people from using less—thus presenting two “arguments” for raising water tariffs.

Another Tisza Party MEP, Eszter Lakos, voted in favor of the European Parliament’s Industry, Research, and Energy Committee opinion on the COP 29 climate change conference in autumn 2024. The document’s supporters criticized the level of household energy subsidies, such as utility cost reductions, and called for their phase-out.

Who Pays the Piper Calls the Tune

Kriszta Bodis’ case highlights two key points. Firstly, Hungary’s activist organizations, funded by Brussels and major globalist players such as George Soros's network, actively collaborate in efforts against the patriotic government. Secondly, Peter Magyar’s party is not only working against Hungarian interests through its MEPs who are committed to the European People’s Party but has also elevated an activist backed by Brussels to a key domestic position, reinforcing the EU elite’s agenda in Hungary.