Soros’s people exposed one after the other: There is no trace of dictatorship in Hungary + videos

In Hungary, NGOs (non-governmental organisations) have nothing to be afraid of, there is no intention to foil their operations, and foreign investors, too, can feel safe, reveals the next instalment of our newspaper’s series of articles in which we quote again from the Skype interviews sent to Magyar Nemzet from an unkown e-mail address. The parties to the interviews are without exception civil society actors who, together with their organisations, attacked and continue to attack almost every measure adopted by the Hungarian government. However, in conversations among themselves – as our writings published in recent weeks reveal – they openly admit that by manipulating uninformed foreign journalists, they depict a false, distorted image of Hungary.

“Hungary is a member of both the EU and NATO, and greatly depends on foreign investments. If we take a look at the influx of large corporations, we will see that the largest companies such as Audi, Mercedes and the others provide jobs for tens of thousands of people. So, the situation is not like in Russia. Over here, people are not locked up in prison, the government doesn’t nationalise big companies. I believe that foreign investors don’t have much to worry about,” the AEI’s senior associate said. According to Mr Rohac, Hungary started from a much better situation than Bulgaria or Romania, and by Central-Eastern-European standards Hungary is a civilised place where you can rely on the courts to enforce contracts. 

Blind hatred 

In an interview which was probably made during the first or second wave of the coronavirus pandemic, Anderj Nosko mentioned the perception of the management of the coronavirus pandemic as an example of the fact that the government was even criticised for guaranteeing society’s safety with the restrictive measures introduced due to the pandemic. 

Let’s take a look at the pandemic crisis from the very beginning. […] Now, the big question is the closure of borders. Entry for non-nationals and those without a registered address in Hungary was restricted. This measure is largely viewed based on whether you are on the government’s side or not. I’ve seen or read very few evaluations which assess these measures on their actual merits. Whether this rule helps the fight against the pandemic, and what its implications are for health care and the economy. The whole thing is mainly about the fact that ‘we hate Orbán, and so this is a bad measure,

 Mr Nosko said. 

Biased campaign 

Readers may remember that in a Skype interview quoted by Magyar Nemzet earlier, Mr Nosko stated in black and white that there is an unfounded, biased campaign against Hungary and Poland, and that uninformed foreign journalists manipulated by NGOs depict a distorted image of Hungary. In his view, the circumstance that mainstream media now work with far fewer foreign correspondents than before, and that they are additionally required to report on the affairs of multiple countries leads to intellectual laziness. 

“As a result, Poland and Hungary can be criticised very easily, without actual arguments,” the former director of the Soros Foundations stated. He said a further problem is that many foreign journalists do not speak Hungarian, and so they are unable to talk to ordinary people in the street and are likewise unable to read the local news. They therefore rely on secondary sources – mostly, on persons sharing the same political views as themselves – and this leads to distorted reports on the Hungarian government. 

Freedom House and agitprop 

“These secondary sources are rather distorted, including as regards the legitimacy of the Hungarian government,” the former director of OSF said. According to Mr Nosko, they typically fail to mention that the Hungarian cabinet is, in actual fact, highly popular in large segments of society. 

Mr Nosko also spoke about the NGO Freedom House whose activities are well-documented in Hungary. 

“When reading like ‘nations in transit’ of Freedom House – I’m their reviewer for the Slovak chapter – and sometimes it’s so irritating to see that instead of the analysis you have essentially agitprop, you know. Essentially, whenever it’s your friends who are in the government, then the country is doing well. If it’s not your friends in the government, then whatever they do is just not good enough,” he said.

Fico was not attacked 

“It’s a simple reality: people working in the media are in the vast majority left-liberal. This is due to what we could call ‘selection bias,’” said Andrej Nosko, describing the present situation in the international media. He took the view that if the Hungarian prime minister were a socialist, both the media and the European Union would treat him differently. He mentioned Robert Fico’s premiership in Slovakia and his level of acceptance as an example. 

In another Skype interview, Dalibor Rohac, a Slovak researcher who studied the processes of Eastern and Central Europe and the EU as a research associate of the American Enterprise Institute, too, mentioned Robert Fico as an example. He said the government led by Fico which was nominally social democrat was rather corrupt, but Fico was regarded as one of their own given that he belonged to the group of European socialists. This is why Mr Fico never had to encounter the same degree of pushback from Brussels as Viktor Orbán. 

In Mr Rohac’s opinion, if Orbán were voted out, and the Hungarian socialists came back, there would be a massive sigh of relief in Brussels.

Control 

In yet another Skype interview, former contributor of the news portals 24.hu and Index Mátyás Kálmán, too, spoke about bias. He said various NGOs manipulate or even bribe journalists reporting about Hungary, and so they tend to misrepresent events taking place in the country. 

“You don’t know whether a given journalist received an invitation to a fine hotel, and how much he or she was offered to write the story that they want to hear told in the media,” Mr Kálmán said describing an example of manipulative practices, specifically mentioning Amnesty International, an organisation financed by George Soros, as one of the NGOs that seek to control journalists.

Photo: Open Society Foundation website