The Ukrainian tone was quite bellicose especially after the start of the war, but later the volume seemed to be turned down a bit. What changed?
Actually, the belligerent tone was already present before, but the war brought a further deterioration of relations. We attributed this to the heightened level of emotion, since Ukraine was obviously in a kind of panic in the first phase of the war, and whether it would be able to stand was in question. Therefore, there was no similarly sharp Hungarian reaction to the sometimes particularly rude outbursts of Ukrainian leaders. Incidentally, Ukraine's more confident attitude towards Hungary has been observable since 2014.
This can be attributed to the support they feel behind them from nearly the entire Western world and this has also bolstered their self-confidence.
Many people might have thought that eventually Hungary would be left all alone on the issue of Ukraine and that there would be no diplomatic repercussions if they continue to bash us. However, bilateral relations have never been defined by what some shout from across the border.
If we peel away the minority issue, what is the relationship with Ukrainian colleagues like?
If we put that aside, our cooperation with almost all Ukrainian actors is excellent. This is especially true with the Transcarpathian leadership, which understood that if we do not place controversial issues at the center of our communication, then we can be successful. Even is the worst periods, we were able to maintain this joint work, by separating off the cooperation with the Transcarpathians from the conflict between the capitals. One result is the opening of a new border crossing point soon, and another is that Hungary is part of the development of an alternative transport corridor - with end points in Transcarpathia and in Italy - that would connect Ukraine with the sea.
Szóljon hozzá!
Jelenleg csak a hozzászólások egy kis részét látja. Hozzászóláshoz és a további kommentek megtekintéséhez lépjen be, vagy regisztráljon!