
– What is really at stake in this case? And when have similar situations occurred in Church history?
– What is at stake is not a building. What is at stake is that the organs of a democratic state are reaching back to a set of tools perfected by the party-state: violence hidden behind the appearance of legality. On paper, everything is in order. Everything is regular. Every procedure meets the formal requirements. Meanwhile, step by step, they are pushing us out of what is legally ours — what we have used without interruption since 1808, and whose canonical seat the Holy See fixed in 1947. This is not a new method. Church history knows it well. St. Athanasius the Great was exiled five times because he refused to sign what the imperial court expected of him: acceptance of the Arian heresy, which denied the divinity of Christ. Each exile took place through legal procedures. Each time there was a proper charge. Each time there was a court decision. And yet everyone knew what it was really about: whoever refuses to bow before power must be removed. St. Gregory of Nazianzus wrote of him:
“To those who struck him, he was like a diamond.” That means the more they struck him, the harder he proved to be. He did not break. He did not bend. He did not wear away. That is exactly what my solemn vows require of me as well.
Nor should we forget St. Thomas Becket, the Archbishop of Canterbury. He was not killed overnight. King Henry II of England tried for years to break him by legal means: lawsuits, exile, confiscation of property. The reason was simple: the archbishop refused to subordinate the Church to royal power. When every legal instrument failed, four knights entered the cathedral and killed him before the altar. These are not abstract examples from the past. They show that the method is always the same. If something cannot be taken openly because the law protects it, then power works around it: municipal and state harassment, financial strangulation, isolation, false narratives — until the person grows exhausted and leaves voluntarily. But I will not leave. I will not give up the Premonstratensian heritage of Váradhegyfok, which I was elected by my elderly confreres to preserve and recover, and in defense of which I took my oath as provost at the altar of the church, written in my own hand.




























Szóljon hozzá!
Jelenleg csak a hozzászólások egy kis részét látja. Hozzászóláshoz és a további kommentek megtekintéséhez lépjen be, vagy regisztráljon!