The analysis published last week by Hungary's Sovereignty Protection Office (SPO) on the USAID scandal and its Hungarian corruption connections has sparked a significant outcry. The study has been heavily criticized and discredited by the leftist-liberal press, while the report reveals crucial findings on how and why - and with the help of whom - the pro-Democratic Party deep state in the United States, the U.S. State Department, and the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) sought to influence Central European regional politics. The document received special attention, as shocking facts about the program came to light.

Terrorists and lack of transparency
As demonstrated in the previous part of this series, abuses within the USAID program came to light after Donald Trump took office. It was revealed that funds were distributed to numerous terrorist organizations, including Palestinian Hamas and the Afghan Taliban. Money also indirectly reached Somalia’s al-Shabaab, Sudan’s Hamza Network, Islamic Jihad, Lebanon’s Hezbollah, Iraq’s Kataib Hezbollah, Syria’s Hayat Tahrir al-Sham, and dozens of other terrorist organizations.
As pointed out in part one, USAID’s Central Europe Program (CEP) was launched in 2021, shortly after Joe Biden took office. The objective was to bring down democratically elected governments in the region—that failed to align with the Democrats—through a network of political pressure groups, financial support, and "professional assistance." The funding routes were non-transparent, as in many cases, American databases deliberately concealed beneficiaries. The grant scheme was designed to mobilize established actors who were already embedded in Brussels’ lobbying structures as effectively as possible. But who exactly organized these programs?
Shadows in the dark
The Sovereignty Protection Office’s report recalls that USAID and the U.S. State Department have long worked closely to organize programs and develop country-specific strategies. "The strategy-building process was facilitated by the fluid movement of personnel between these institutions and the nonprofit (and for-profit) organizations surrounding USAID. Deep-state bureaucrats who effectively represented its interests frequently transitioned between organizations, depending on where their expertise was most needed. The details of the Central Europe Program were hammered out accordingly," the report states.