According to him, Brussels is openly on the side of immigration: Europe’s birthrate is low, and the EU wants to replace missing children with migrants. That’s why they passed the emergency quota against Hungary’s objections, and now want to turn it into a permanent one. Kiszelly said Peter Magyar has taken over the dollar left’s narrative, claiming they would keep the border fence, but failing to mention that the fence only works if the legal border closure is also maintained.
However, they do not talk about the legal border closure,
he said. In practice, Kiszelly explained, this would mean migrants would not even need to climb the fence. They can just walk up to the border and claim they are Syrian refugees.
Peter Magyar did what he could to dodge issues that might scare off voters. On Ukraine, he waved Manfred Weber’s letter, while on migration he called it a fake problem. This way, he avoided having to talk about such uncomfortable issues,
the expert said. Kiszelly concluded that even if Peter Magyar does not speak about these topics, the Tisza Party remains a member of the European People’s Party. Their position is clear: even if Tisza MEPs do not always vote with their EP group, there is a strong majority behind these questions. After a possible election victory, there will be no need for caution and the Tisza Party would openly support Brussels’ policies across the board.
Cover photo: Peter Magyar and Manfred Weber (Photo: AFP)




















Szóljon hozzá!
Jelenleg csak a hozzászólások egy kis részét látja. Hozzászóláshoz és a további kommentek megtekintéséhez lépjen be, vagy regisztráljon!