What we can see is that Iran has limited options for retaliation. We do not know exactly what missiles it has or how many of them, but this will likely become clearer in the coming days. What is certain is that Iran’s proxy network is in very poor condition, meaning it can involve them in a retaliatory strike to a much smaller extent than it would prefer,
he stressed. He also pointed out that in Iraq various Shiite groups already stayed out of the earlier 12-day war, largely because they knew they would be exposed to Israeli and American counterstrikes. For them it was more important to preserve their domestic political position and their political and economic status within Iraq. Syria has now effectively joined the American camp. In Lebanon, Hezbollah has become a shadow of its former self, having lost a significant portion of its missiles and almost all of its military leadership.
The current leader of Hezbollah, Naim Qassem, comes from a civilian background and therefore is not a battle-hardened figure like his predecessor or other leaders who were lost. Rhetorically, he still stands by Iran, of course. This is important for several reasons, including the fact that Hezbollah members continue to receive their salaries from Iran, and in dollars. Therefore it is important for them to show verbal support, but they have very limited capacity to give any response to Israel,
the expert explained. Based on recent experience, it can also be said that the Houthi rebels had already tried to back out during the Gaza conflict. Iran therefore has relatively few partners it can rely on. At the same time, the situation in the Middle East has a destabilizing effect on global oil prices and on the entire region, especially if civilian air traffic and air cargo transport are suspended due to attacks and military operations.




















Szóljon hozzá!
Jelenleg csak a hozzászólások egy kis részét látja. Hozzászóláshoz és a további kommentek megtekintéséhez lépjen be, vagy regisztráljon!