IMF, Tisza Party Say 13th-Month Pensions Are a Problem
The IMF isn’t stopping at tax hikes. It’s also demanding pension reforms—raising the retirement age and cutting benefits. Strikingly, similar ideas are being articulated by Tisza Party-linked economists. Economist Andras Simonovits has floated the idea of taxing pensions and scrapping the “Women 40” early retirement program, while Maria Zita Petschnig has publicly questioned the affordability of the 13th-month pension—echoing the IMF’s own 2021 report, which labeled the extra payment a “budgetary burden.”
The Hungarian government, however, takes the opposite approach—standing by retirees rather than global bankers. As Prime Minister Viktor Orban recently announced, Hungary is not only continuing the 13-month benefit but is also introducing a 14th-month pension, “no matter how much the international bank network dislikes it.”
IMF Targets Utility Price Cuts
A September 2025 IMF report criticized Hungary’s household utility price reduction program, arguing that it delays the phase-out of fossil fuels and discourages energy-saving behavior. That same argument has been echoed by members of the Tisza Party. As Gabriella Gerzsenyi, Tisza’s MEP, stated: “What would really help households would be to encourage savings—right now, since energy is cheap, people aren’t motivated to reduce consumption.”
The Hungarian government, however, has held since 2012 that true protection for families comes from keeping the share of income spent on utilities as low as possible. And the results speak for themselves. According to a recent Szazadveég Foundation survey, 22 percent of Europeans cannot adequately heat their homes, and 26 percent have failed to pay utility bills at least once in the past year due to financial hardship. Hungary ranks among the least affected countries in both categories within the EU.




















Szóljon hozzá!
Jelenleg csak a hozzászólások egy kis részét látja. Hozzászóláshoz és a további kommentek megtekintéséhez lépjen be, vagy regisztráljon!